»
S
I
D
E
B
A
R
«
Cluesday October 28th: the Army invades the U.S… are we scared yet?
October 28th, 2008 by Paul Daniel Ash

Last month, the Army Times reported that, for “the first time,” (and yeah, this is a direct quote), “an active unit has been given a dedicated assignment” inside the United States. We’re not talking a temporary assignment á la Katrina – rather, the 3rd Infantry Division’s 1st Brigade Combat Team (the “First of the Third”) is being given a permanent, dedicated assignment under NORTHCOM, the Army’s Northern Command for the purposes of (and, again, I quote) “help[ing] with civil unrest and crowd control.”

A unit that has spent “35 of the last 60 months in Iraq,” with a full complement of battle-stressed warfighters, some suffering from PTSD, is now potentially to be deployed into some future, undefined imaginary tense situations in our major cities in full battle gear, including “the first ever nonlethal package that the Army has fielded… nonlethal weapons designed to subdue unruly or dangerous individuals without killing them.”

Oh yeah. Nothing to be worried about here. How ’bout them Phils, huh?

Clue one: the stated mission literally makes no sense

I can’t remember ever seeing a “crowd” that needed a military combat team to “control” it. Especially now that our urban police forces are so helpfully kitted out with rubber bullets, tear gas and Tasers.

We have National Guardsmen, many of whom have similar wartime experience as the First of the Third, whose legally-defined role it is to perform these functions under the command of the state governors. There has not yet been any justification presented for the assertion that suddenly what is needed is a Federal military presence under command of the President.

Clue number two: it’s illegal… or it used to be

The Posse Comitatus Act, in 1878, made it a crime for the military to perform civilian functions inside the US. The one exception to this was spelled out in the 1807 Insurrection Act. In the 2006 Defense Authorization Act, that exception was broadened to include “natural disaster, epidemic, or other serious public health emergency, terrorist attack or incident, or other condition.” It was, helpfully, left up to the President, and the President alone, to define what that last part means.

Clue the third: martial law has already been held out as a threat

U.S. Rep. Brad Sherman of California spoke before Congress (this actually happened, it’s in the Congressional Record and viewable on YouTube), that unnamed Administration officials threatened to declare martial law if the $700 billion bailout bill wasn’t passed:

“The only way they can pass this bill is by creating and sustaining a panic atmosphere. … Many of us were told in private conversations that if we voted against this bill on Monday that the sky would fall, the market would drop two or three thousand points the first day and a couple of thousand on the second day, and a few members were even told that there would be martial law in America if we voted no.”

I mean, it’s certainly in the realm of possibility that a United States Congressman is either lying or bugshit insane. Given the bullying style of this Administration, though, Occam’s Razor kind of pushes me in the direction of taking him at face value.

So, if they threatened martial law if the market crashed…. and if the market is now crashing or teetering on the edge of a crash… do I gotta draw you guys a map?

Clue IV: Chekhov’s gun

Russian playwright Anton Chekhov once said “if in the first act you have hung a pistol on the wall, then in the following one it should be fired. Otherwise don’t put it there.” Why would the Bush Administration arrogate this enormous power to itself if it didn’t intend to use it? Why did they deploy 5,000 battle-hardened soldiers inside this country now: a month before bitterly-contested national elections – almost certainly to be lost in a big way by the ruling party – and at a time of national anxiety about the economy?

I’m not seriously advocating panic or hyper-dramatizing the situation. But even under the most optimistic assumptions about the goals and potential outcomes of this deployment… wouldn’t prudence sort of demand that people ask some fucking questions of their government? Isn’t that just common sense?

Or is it just me?


11 Responses  
- Are You Riled Up? - » Blog Archive » The Clue-By-Four » Blog Archive » Cluesday October 28th: the Army … writes:
October 28th, 2008 at 8:11 pm

[...] Brad Sherman of California spoke before Congress (this actually happened, it’s in the Congressional Record and viewable on YouTube), that unnamed Administration officials threatened to declare martial law if the $700 billion bailout …[Continue Reading] [...]

Hedon writes:
October 28th, 2008 at 11:24 pm

OMG!! This is stunning news!

I just have no words… and that’s probably a first for me. Did you ever read the book “The Handmaid’s Tale” by M. Atwood?

Wow.

Dreamybee writes:
October 29th, 2008 at 5:54 am

My cousin and I were just talking the other night about how there are probably going to be riots galore after the election, no matter what the outcome, especially if it is a narrow victory. Maybe they’re planning ahead for that? It’s kind of sad that that now seems like the optimistic alternative…

Wunschdenker writes:
October 29th, 2008 at 6:32 am

I’m certain you’re up on all the latest by Naomi Wolf? This, she says, is simply one of the steps that occurs in setting up a dictatorship – that will happen soon….bizarre or what?! Stranger things have happened, eh?

michelle of bleeding espresso writes:
October 31st, 2008 at 1:18 pm

We’re good at hiding people in southern Italy if the need should arise.

I’m just sayin’.

redbuckeye writes:
October 31st, 2008 at 2:36 pm

People are now only realizing the path that the United States has been strolling down for the past few decades. It hasnt been until the Feds have decided to place battle hardened soldiers on our own soil that people are realizing that fascism does not begin with a radical party marching in uniform down the streets. It begins with the brainwashing of the masses, leading citizens to believe we all have a common interest in surrendering liberty for a bit of security. Hope is not lost; America may, if policy makers of integrity are elected, break free of the unfortunate sequence of events from the past few decades. However, we may end up being lured into the belly of the beast and never see it coming. Americans, in general, have a tendency to think that we are the best, and that we will last forever. Unfortunately, this is what the politicians have been preaching to us our throughout our lives. We have no other conceptualization of what America may be if we are not the “best” the most “powerful” and the “richest”

surfed writes:
November 1st, 2008 at 3:22 pm

I foresee the Canadian population increasing soon…..

oracle@kc writes:
November 1st, 2008 at 10:48 pm

yes.we should be asking what the hell’s up, and why the hell no major news sources reported this. i tend to think it probably has something to do with the elections,but anyone’s guess is as good as mine.does everyone here know that earlier this year bush issued what amounts to an executive order stating in case of an emergency(which he gets to define) he can suspend and take control of all local and national government activity and those basic services and industries he deems ” necessary” for our “protection”. ?

Barack2 writes:
November 2nd, 2008 at 12:23 am

Conspiracy theories are not theories when they begin to happen. Obama will be our next and last President. This is being orchestrated by a group that tells the President and the Senate what they can and and will do. One of the main representatives of that group on this continent is Vicente Foxe. When he said jump Bush jumped as high as he could.
The financial crisis was caused to get the populace ready to accept as peaceably as possible the coming planned changes in our government system. (Since when do you restore confidence in the markets by going ballistic, promising doom, and printing money like a bannana republic?) The Republicans and Democrats are just a side show to keep us distracted as our constitution and our country are dismantled.
One of the first big changes will be a new interpretation of the 2nd amendment. Private ownership will be banned “for the common Good”.
The troops you mentioned may be ordered to handle those troublemakers who would defy a government edict.
This has been carefully planned and has been brewing for decades. We are the lucky generation that forcibly gets to drink from that cup.

mentalmosaic writes:
November 2nd, 2008 at 1:57 am

Yowza… Thought-provoking post! Thanks for all the info and links.

It’s my first foray over to your new blog, btw. It’s looking good. (I enjoyed your former blog, as well, though, I must admit. You’re the one who first turned me onto Roberto Saviano, for example, so don’t sell yourself short!)

Ciao!
~Tui

the clue-by-four » Blog Archive » Cluesday November 4th: on non-voting writes:
November 4th, 2008 at 8:37 am

[...] – or threatened wars – in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Iran, warrantless surveillance of Americans, a standing Army in our midst and the unforgivable plundering of the public fisc to enrich Wall Street, there’s little [...]

Leave a Reply

»  Substance: WordPress   »  Style: Ahren Ahimsa
© paulus aciavatus fecit mmix