<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: let&#8217;s get small</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cluebyfour.com/2009/06/lets-get-small/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cluebyfour.com/2009/06/lets-get-small/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 08:28:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Daniel Ash</title>
		<link>http://cluebyfour.com/2009/06/lets-get-small/comment-page-1/#comment-1387</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Daniel Ash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 19:14:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cluebyfour.com/?p=809#comment-1387</guid>
		<description>Interesting. I&#039;ve never encountered that reaction whenever I&#039;ve discussed this idea with anyone.

I wonder why that is?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting. I&#8217;ve never encountered that reaction whenever I&#8217;ve discussed this idea with anyone.</p>
<p>I wonder why that is?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://cluebyfour.com/2009/06/lets-get-small/comment-page-1/#comment-1386</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 18:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cluebyfour.com/?p=809#comment-1386</guid>
		<description>This really is a great idea, and I agree with you on the idea of breaking the US up into smaller, more easy to manage parts, but since it threatens the integrity of the Empire it must be spun as racist at all costs, just like everything else that threatens the benevolent hegemony of the American Empire.

But unfortunately, due to those &quot;political realities&quot; I always hear about, such a solution will be immediately framed as &quot;states rights&quot; and therefore racist.  Any mention of a crack in Lincoln&#039;s Perfect Union and you&#039;ll be labeled a bircher and accused of being the harbinger for Jim Crow 2.0.  Race based fear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This really is a great idea, and I agree with you on the idea of breaking the US up into smaller, more easy to manage parts, but since it threatens the integrity of the Empire it must be spun as racist at all costs, just like everything else that threatens the benevolent hegemony of the American Empire.</p>
<p>But unfortunately, due to those &#8220;political realities&#8221; I always hear about, such a solution will be immediately framed as &#8220;states rights&#8221; and therefore racist.  Any mention of a crack in Lincoln&#8217;s Perfect Union and you&#8217;ll be labeled a bircher and accused of being the harbinger for Jim Crow 2.0.  Race based fear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

